What exactly was Galvez trying to hide and afraid to divulge? It is a fundamental tenet of law that one cannot be bound by a law unless that law is fixed and certain, yet by CCRA’s own admission in their own records, their policies are hidden and they are secretive about divulging them. In order for a contract to be lawful, it must have full disclosure, uncoerced mutual agreement and mutual consideration. The “voluntary tax” scam CCRA runs in the Justice Department possesses none of these elements. These assholes actually tell you to go searching for it in the library when you ask them for a certified copy of the Income Tax Act. I mailed every MP in Canada and asked them for a certified copy of the Act and not one of them sent one.

Bleak and futile as their own records indicate and in clear violation of their own Income Tax Act laid out in Section 2253.51 in their Terms of Payment.

What is the result of the crimes that CCRA has committed against us? We will never deal with them again. This agenda against us came after we FILED our income taxes and then could not afford to pay because we had lost everything we owned. CCRA knows this and their documentation repeats time and again that we have nothing. $3.21 to collect 5,000, 10,000, 12,000 or any,000 is just fucking stupid isn’t it? Duh? Do you fucking well think maybe just maybe the CCRA criminals at the top wrote Section 2253.51 because they know you cannot collect something that does not exist? So why the fuck can’t they put tax dog McMeekin on a leash? I thought it was against the law to let your lap mutt shit all over the place without picking up its turds. These idiots charge you to get bitten by this dog and then want you to pay for it. In a pig’s ass.

Before everything was stolen from us and there were no social programs to help us out for the thousands of dollars we have paid in taxes over the years, all my taxes were always paid. After we lost everything I contacted CCRA. In spite of the fact that my taxes were paid for the year before, they reassessed us and sent us a bill for $650. after I called them and told them everything had been stolen from us, including our records on our computers. I paid this bill. It took two years to finally get back on our feet after we ended up living in our car with our four kids. The first thing I did as soon as I could afford to do so is to hire an accountant to do our income taxes. We gave CCRA all we had. When we told them we didn’t even have the money they wanted and voluntarily opened our door and bank accounts to show them we were telling the truth, they attacked us with malice of forethought and full knowledge of the fact recorded in their own records here that we were financially destitute. It is for this reason that I started protesting CCRA and unlawful income taxes and none other. If CCRA wants to call me a detax advocate then they should know that I am what I am because of their crimes against me when I was following what I believed to be the law. I always paid my taxes before we lost everything in the past and CCRA’s own records show this. It is clear that it is their own actions that have set me against them. In doing so they have exposed the criminal conspiracy that enslaves our country. For this much, I sincerely thank them in a most patriotic spirit.

Q. What is wrong with taxation?

A. When you have a financial interest in a human being; that is slavery. Slavery is a crime against humanity. When I have no choice in which tax I will or will not pay, the government has a financial interest in me as a human being. Debt peonage and slavery in any of its other forms are crimes against humanity and I refuse to be party to a feudal crime left over from the dark ages.

We are badly educated in Canada. We have been purposely mis-educated to be a mind controlled herd. As a consequence, we are bereft of common sense. One of the reasons we are so easily mislead is because we often do not understand what it is we are talking about yet hold an opinion regardless. Case in point:

Hansard is a publication that comprises the official notes of what transpires in the house of representatives. There is a Hansard in  Canada and there is a Hansard in the UK. In 1982, Canadians argued incessantly as to whether or not we could ‘patriate’ a Constitution. Debates concerning this were underway in the UK Parliament, which prompted one English Lord, a J. Enoch Powell, to rise to his feet and ask “How comes it that Canadians are so easily lead by the nose as to believe by this process that this document can be justiciable as a constitution? The reason is that not only have they been deceived, but their forefathers were deceived before them and I wash my hands of this entire affair.” He goes on to talk about the fraud of the BNA Act. You will find the aforementioned statement in the UK Hansard for 1 March 1982 – 15 March 1982.

If you look in any English Language Dictionary, even Black’s Law Dictionary, published before 1982, you will not find the word ‘patriate’. The reason is because there is no such thing. If the “Constitution” were being “repatriated” it would be sent back to the United Kingdom because the BNA Act is an act of the UK parliament. If one considers what the definition of a “constitution” is, it become very clear why you can not ‘patriate’ it, even if such a word existed in the English language. One quickly sees the only valid way Canada can have a constitution is if we the people of Canada write one and unanimously agree upon it.

In the interests of communication, I would like to offer the following definitions paraphrased from Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition:

Free – not subject to the legal constraint of another.

State – a people in a given geographical area.

Civil Service – employees of the state.

Government – representatives elected by the state to govern the civil service.

Constitution – body of law written by the state to control the government.

The aforementioned definitions give one an insight into how a free and judicial society must organize itself in order to remain free. Of the fact that we are free, I have no doubts.  On many occasions I was taught that generations of my countrymen paid the penultimate price; gave their lives to keep my country free. On many other occasions I stood and pledged, at the top of my lungs; my true patriot love to honour that commitment and “keep our land glorious and free”.

Consider the meaning of the term free; not subject to the legal constraint of another. A legal constraint is known as legislation. That means a free person is not subject to legislation. The opposite of free is enslaved, which therefore means that an enslaved person is subject to legislation. It also seems clear that we lose our ‘state of freedom’ one piece of legislation at a time. How is it possible that we live in one of the most highly legislated societies on the face of the earth and still believe we are free?

Consider the meaning of the term state. Canadians seem to miss the fact that we the people are the state. The terms state and government appear to be synonymous to most in Canadian society. The authority, for the government to govern the civil service, issues from the state. This is the reason why we have a federal vote. Free men vote to institute governments in order to govern the civil service, not to govern themselves. Free men are self - governing and it is not the venue of their governments to tell them anything.

How can we the people of the state hold our governments accountable and control them if we can’t even control our own purse strings? Perhaps you believe you have a viable argument for enforcing taxation upon me, but as a free man, I have the right to disagree with that and make up my own mind on the issue. I believe myself to be a kind and responsible man. Where I can help, I do. I have the right to keep my own money in my own pocket and spend it as I see fit. I have the right not to support things I view as frivolous on the part of government and I have the right not to pay my hard earned income into a fraudulent scheme run by Canada’s government; which is controlled by the Crowned Head of the Anglican Church.

Finally, do the little shit rats in government know exactly what they are doing? Of course they are. With malice of forethought we have been attacked by scum bags like R.B. McMeekin who exist for no other reason than to rob the rest of us for their pay cheques. Call this whining little snot and he will tell you “I am just doing my job.” Horse shit. When doing your job entails committing crimes against your own fellow countrymen that steals the food out of their children’s mouths and the roof from over their head, they are nothing more than low life scum bag criminals.

Read in CCRA’s own documents how they admit that their policies and information are NOT fully disclosed. Hearing a hollow sound, the scum bag on the phone writing in his own records believed he was being recorded and acted like the criminal he is by being careful not to disclose information or policies. So much for fixed and certain legislation. In such a system, ALL citizens are at their peril when the public targets them in the name of their foreign Anglican Church employer.

Read in CCRA’s own documents how they say that a “Requirement To Pay” is a federal court order. And the scum bag even writes in his own CCRA records as you can see in this documentation; “(it’s a good thing that is exactly what RTP’s are.)” They never ever divulged this information to us and I never found that out until I got these documents from CCRA under the Freedom of Information Act. But let us examine this further…

A “requirement to pay” is a court order. In spite of trying to get CCRA to get me to court so that I can defend myself after letting them in my house and as you can see from their own documentation, offered them everything that I had, they hold a private “ex parte” federal court hearing and convict me in absentia even though I was only living two miles away from the court and would have welcomed the opportunity to defend myself.

I was surprised to find out not only that information, but also the ex parte federal court order among the documents I got from CCRA under the FOI Act. But let us look closely at these documents.

R.B. McMeekin said he never knew we only had $3.21 in our bank account. As you can see from the documentation; he lied. When my wife called to ask why they froze our account, as you can see from their documentation, they lied and said they knew nothing about it, when R.B. McMeekin’s own entry in HIS records shows he knew there was only $3.21 and sent the RTP.

Now look at the RTP that R.B. McMeekin sent to the bank. It is dated APRIL 26, 1998. Now look at the letter S. McCafferty sent to the bank on APRIL 29, 1999 rescinding the RTP that was sent on April 26, 1998. The date the cancellation was sent to the bank was April 29, 1999.

But remember that CCRA writes in their own file that a RTP is a court order. So let us now look at this jack-in-the-box surprise hidden court order. It is dated November 23, 1999. Look at that! A RTP is a court order, but R.B. McMeekin had sent out the RTP a year and a half BEFORE he even got this toilet paper kangaroo court order. Is that the reason he did the paperwork to cancel the order a year after his damage was done? Here is a public servant abusing judicial machinery and it is certainly to knowingly commit a gross violation of public trust. These are OBVIOUS CRIMES being committed in our foreign controlled government against the people of the Canadian state. There is no limit to how low they will stoop to coerce you into performance of their unlawful “legal” documents.

My eldest daughter was an honours student from grade six onward and graduated from High School with an award for “honours with distinction”. She was horrified to learn that the high school would not accept her scholarships unless her parents filled out their income tax forms as they were instructed to do by CCRA. CCRA attacked not me, but my child; her future over before it even started. Devastated, she got a job as a network administrator until she could no longer work unless she got a SIN. Since she did not want to pay into a society that did not want to educate her, she refused and was finally let go even though they were still deducting the taxes. CCRA still stole money from her in taxes in spite of the fact that to this day she does not possess a SIN from the British Crown Anglican Church and never agreed to any of it. She still pays taxes when she buys things like the rest of us.

Is stalking children suddenly lawful just because it is government employee scum bags doing it? You can see from CCRA’s own documents that Thea Smith was stalking my children in order to get information on me. This little nazi bitch actually called my son’s principal to find out when the children moved into the area. Note she writes “CONFIDENTIAL: Called Woodbine school – spoke with Paddy Malaney – principal – children moved to Riverbend school a couple of months ago.” Now you know why these thieves shake down married couples with children for more money than anyone else.

They force your children into school’s where they are fed British Crown myths and taught idiotic nonsense such as “your country is FREE AND a DOMINION”. They teach them that the most disgusting behaviour is normal and we need to accept the basest of actions without revulsion. And then they use them to persecute you when they know full well that you do not even have the money to house or feed them.

Do these people truly believe they collect taxes for the “benefit of society?” Then why do they persecute society to do so? Why do they persecute children to do so? Absolutely nothing justifies either the “crimes against humanity” or the criminal activity that the likes of R.B. McMeekin and Thea Smith do in the name of “service” to us. They are common criminals in the pay of a foreign power.

It is time to kick the British Crown from England the hell out of Canada and fire all the employees of this foreign church owned corporation. Only then will the Canadian state, the people of Canada, be able to elect a government that swears allegiance to the Canadian people and truly represents the Canadian state. Only then will we have a government that governs only the civil service; the employees of the Canadian state, and the free men of Canada will have control of their free country. Until then, we are all at our absolute jeopardy by these traitors and their treasonous acts against the Canadian state, as documented by themselves in their own files. It is untenable that these scum bags expect me to pay for my own persecution. It is untenable to expect me to do anything other than hate my foreign controlled government with the truly righteous indignation of any other persecuted slave in the long tortured history of the British Crown. What “reasonable man” with even an inkling of a sense of honour or responsibility to his family, his country and his fellow countryman would bow to the fascist tyranny of this legislated slave society?

It is clear that the reasonable free men in our society would not get together and institute a government for themselves when they are free and self-governing. It is clear the lawful venue of government is to govern the civil service. As a free man in a free country and as an paying employer of CCRA, I hereby fire the fucking lot of them and recommend they all be tried for their knowledgeable culpability in these fraudulent schemes to collect their own wages for no action other than forcing free people to complete their paperwork.